[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SVN type concerns

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 2001-02-23 00:12:28 CET

cmpilato@collab.net writes:
> Karl Fogel <kfogel@galois.ch.collab.net> writes:
> > I'd like to hear others' thoughts on this. For what it's worth, I'm
> > +0 on getting rid of svn_boolean_t. It does give a readability bonus
> > imho, but it's not worth a whole new type.
>
> I'm -0 on getting rid of svn_boolean_t. If it stays, though, +1 on
> typedef'ing svn_boolean_t to 'unsigned char' just to piss Jim off. ;-)

This is the correct attitude.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:23 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.