[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: static linking RA libs

From: Bob Miller <kbob_at_jogger-egg.com>
Date: 2001-02-22 16:13:03 CET

Greg Stein wrote:

> I'm assuming that we'll be picking up an APRUTIL dependency by M2. Assuming
> that is the case, then I'd suggest that you use apr_dbm for the client-side
> property storage. That will pick up whatever is on the system for the DBM
> storage, rather than adding a (DB3) dependency to the client.
>
> Currently, it can work against DB1, DB1.85, DB2, DB3, SDBM, and GDBM. Coming
> "soon" is NDBM. One of those will "always" be on your system.

Does that mean that different client binaries may not be able to use
the same client workspace, because of DB format differences?

That sounds wrong to me. Better to pick one DB format and require it. 

-- 
Bob Miller                              K<bob>
kbobsoft consulting
http://kbobsoft.com                     kbob_at_jogger-egg.com
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:23 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.