[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: open by ID (was: Re: New FS API, open_path, cloning and dag_node_t)

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 2001-02-19 22:01:19 CET

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> That would be fine, as long as the ID remains the same for an file that
> wasn't changed from R1 to R2.

So the ID would be the basis for caching?
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:22 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Greg Stein: "Re: open by ID (was: Re: New FS API, open_path, cloning and dag_node_t)"
Previous message: Jim Blandy: "Re: Why revisions table is necessary?"
In reply to: Greg Stein: "Re: open by ID (was: Re: New FS API, open_path, cloning and dag_node_t)"
Next in thread: Greg Stein: "Re: open by ID (was: Re: New FS API, open_path, cloning and dag_node_t)"
Reply: Greg Stein: "Re: open by ID (was: Re: New FS API, open_path, cloning and dag_node_t)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.