[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Minor Documentation Patch

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2001-02-05 15:11:35 CET

The problem was just the compilation warnings. They're annoying false
positives when trying to see how a build went. :-)


Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > I must be missing something. The fact that `remove' is the name of
> > a C library function is irrelevant --- the namespace of global
> > functions/variables doesn't overlap with the namespace of
> > svn_delta_edit_fns members. And an editor's `remove' function does
> > do almost the same thing as the C library's `remove'.
> It should be okay as long as everybody is properly
> standards-compliant. It's conceivable that some platform invades the
> application's preprocessor symbol namespace and #defines remove to
> something else, but I don't know of any examples.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:21 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.