Re: Change #3: New "WC" properties.

On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:17:20PM +0100, Branko Cibej wrote:
> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> > Note: this is the only editor change that *truly* has nothing to
> > do with "describing a tree change", which should make all of us
> > raise our collective eyebrows suspiciously. However, I don't think
> > the "plug n' play" vision of editors is lost here, although we're
> > skirting the near the line.
>
> One question comes to mind: what about clients that /don't/ use a
> working copy? Kevin's versionable fileystem would be one.

What about them?

It isn't like we can think about everything under the sun. I'd rather put my
brain cycles elsewhere. When somebody wants to use something other than the
WC, then we can truly test the plug-n-play. Personally, I'm not too
interested in heavy thought experiements about the issue.

Feel free for yourself, of course :-)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/