Re: FS copy model

> There are times when a file is linked/copied into another directory
> and it is *desireable* for them to share changes (i.e. no branches),
> and there are times when it is desireable that the only record of
> the copy/link is a note on the initial revision about where the file
> came from.

We do not have immediate plans to support "hard links" (i.e. copies
which share changes). The current discussion is related to the
internals of the filesystem and not the user-visible semantics. I'd
try to explain in more detail, but I'd just wind up reiterating what's
in subversion/libsvn_fs/structure.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:19 2006