Re: (FS) operational question

On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 08:08:24PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
>...
> > If the revision number is to be updated for an entry, then we must also
> > update the version resource URL. If not... We In Big Heap-um Trouble.
> > Therefore, we must respond with all of the new version resource URLs when an
> > update occurs.
>
> We're already in trouble, because we're recording the same information
> twice: the revision number in the entries file is apparently not
> sufficient, so we're recording it in a version resource URL too??
>
> This is what "network layer implementation creeping into working copy
> library" means. :-)

Sigh...

THAT is why I want to remove the revision number from the URL!

-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/