Re: Ancestry arguments for replace functions
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2000-12-22 20:42:06 CET
Greg Stein <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
No, we still need the ancestor_path -- but it is now wholly implied,
We need the ancestory (hence the rev) because the server needs to know
> I like my set_revision() and copyfrom_* naming better. Much clearer. I have
How does it feel after the above clarification?
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.