Re: Ancestry arguments for replace functions (was Re: Greg Stein's...)

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > We agree that this seems to be the case, and therefore that the
> > ancestor_path argument to replace_file() should go away. (There
> > may be analogous changes implied by this elsewhere in the editor; I
> > haven't studied that question yet but expect it to be obvious when
> > I do.)
>
> Presumably the ancestry arguments should go away for
> replace_directory() as well.
>
> I can make the requisite changes to xml_output.c when the time comes,
> assuming I'm around. If I don't happen to be around, they should be
> really simple; just remove the arguments and pass NULL and 0 to
> output_addreplace().

Okay, thanks for the guide.

(Note we're just talking about ancestor_path -- the ancestor_revision
is still necessary.)
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:18 2006