[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: update processing

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 2000-12-16 21:25:30 CET

Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@newton.collab.net> writes:

>
> Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
>
> > The tree-delta XML DTD != using the delta editor. You can use one without
> > the other. I just suggested a different XML format; who said I wasn't going
> > to use the delta editor? :-) :-)
>
> Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. :-)
>
>
> > Actually, the FS layer doesn't use the editor interface. There is going to
> > be some glue (in ra_local) when you link them together.
>
> Huh? Doesn't the FS provide an editor for committing transactions?
> And doesn't the FS drive an editor for updating a working copy? I
> thought this was a basic part of the design.

The FS interface is less restrictive. It provides functions which
make it very easy to write editors, but don't actually require a
depth-first traversal.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:17 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.