RE: dso alternative

> From: Branko Cibej [mailto:brane@xbc.nu]

> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> > I'm going to have a function which takes a URL as input, and returns
a
> > vtable from a RA DSO load. A single process might call this
function
> > over and over -- that's okay, according to what you say above.
(When
> > a process reloads the same DSO over and over, the OS gives it the
same
> > pointer each time, right?)

Well, the following scenario could happen which would give it a
different pointer:

* Load
* Unload
* Load

The pointer could be different at this point in time.

Vs.
* Load
* Load

In this case, the pointer would be the same.

Bill
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:17 2006