> Strictly speaking, our dependency on it would be pretty light.
> mod_dav_svn can just use APRUTIL via Apache itself. However, the FS and
> the server tool(s) will need MD5 hashing and DBM support (the latter
> because mod_dav_svn will use DBM for some stuff, and the tool will need
> to deal with those).
> [ if Berkeley DB utils were exported from FS, then I'd probably use that;
> even better is to add DB3 support to APRUTIL's DBM support. ]
Fitting Berkeley DB into some generic DBM interface sounds pretty
doable. I'd also be happy to export some generic "utility" functions
from svn_fs.h, which might allow tighter integration with a given FS
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:16 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev