[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: couple issues

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2000-12-11 04:26:04 CET

Branko =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=C8ibej?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> We already have a tools directory, off of the top level. I'd rather put
> that in tools/server than cerate a new directory for such things.


> We have too many base64 implementations now. There's one in Subversion,
> one in neon and one in APRUTIL ... I'd go for shifting whatever is
> needed to support SVN into APRUTIL and throw our implemetation away.
> (No, GregH, I'm not implying you did a bad job of it, just that we don't
> want to have too many copies of that stuff. :-) )

+1, assuming we don't lose any functionality.

> in the "etc." category, it would be nice to have a tool that could
> atomically pull out a set of deltas between two repository revisions.
> Then you could do incremental, history-preserving backups, which is a
> Good Thing.

Hmm. That sounds like an svn client to me. :-)

Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:16 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.