[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: working copy storage for RA properties

From: Jim Blandy <jimb_at_zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 2000-12-06 17:02:35 CET

> In the abstract sense, yes, transactions can be meaningful across separate
> servers if the transaction involves both of the servers. Some systems
> require this. Distributed transactions in SQL databases come to mind.
> An example case for subversion might be:
> * committing an APR change in the same change set with a working copy
> library change.
> Do we care? Even if we think we care, do we care enough to do the necessary
> 2 phase commit footwork?

[Wearing Subversion coder hat] Nope. Don't care a whit.

[Wearing journeyman hacker hat] Wow! How does it work?
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:16 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.