Well, I can deny neither its usefulness nor its ugliness. Looks good
(bad) to me.
Greg Stein <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:25:45PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Greg Stein <email@example.com> writes:
> > > That sounds like a fine approach to me.
> > >
> > > And note that I'm using URIs to name properties, not something simple like
> > > svn_ra_* :-)
> > Cool, that's even better. Make sure the default prefix is longer than
> > 80 characters, so it never fits on a standard terminal.
> hehe... close.
> The prefix that I'm using is:
> This corresponds to:
> 1) subversion project
> 2) properties
> 3) RA layer
> 4) RA/DAV specifically
> 5) "local" rather than being sent over the wire (e.g. client-side only)
> The two properties will then be "activity-url" and "version-resource".
> Looking at that, I might change tweak the names a bit, but there ya go.
> By using the URI, we can ensure that conflicts won't arise with properties
> other people may define (which, presumably, are also URIs within their
> domain of administrative control).
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:16 2006