[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: working copy storage for RA properties

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2000-12-04 19:44:26 CET

Well, I can deny neither its usefulness nor its ugliness. Looks good
(bad) to me.

-Karl

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:25:45PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> > > That sounds like a fine approach to me.
> > >
> > > And note that I'm using URIs to name properties, not something simple like
> > > svn_ra_* :-)
> >
> > Cool, that's even better. Make sure the default prefix is longer than
> > 80 characters, so it never fits on a standard terminal.
>
> hehe... close.
>
> The prefix that I'm using is:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/props/ra/dav/local/
>
> This corresponds to:
> 1) subversion project
> 2) properties
> 3) RA layer
> 4) RA/DAV specifically
> 5) "local" rather than being sent over the wire (e.g. client-side only)
>
> The two properties will then be "activity-url" and "version-resource".
> Looking at that, I might change tweak the names a bit, but there ya go.
>
> By using the URI, we can ensure that conflicts won't arise with properties
> other people may define (which, presumably, are also URIs within their
> domain of administrative control).
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
> --
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:16 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.