Re: Some filesystem questions

Jim Blandy wrote:

> Not other kinds of records, but if we wanted to adjust the format of
> the revision skel, we could identify new-format revisions with
> ("revision-2" THING ...). The idea is that this data is going to live
> a long time, so there should be room for version tags on most data.

Ah, O.K. That's reasonable.

>> Surely that can't be right? If the number ranges are correct, then the
>> mapping should be "filesystem revision V -> record number V+1".
>
>
> You're right, the text should be changed as you suggest.

Committed.

-- 
Brane �ibej
    home:   <brane_at_xbc.nu>             http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
    work:   <branko.cibej_at_hermes.si>   http://www.hermes-softlab.com/
     ACM:   <brane_at_acm.org>            http://www.acm.org/