Re: scheduling, and gui clients (Win, Mac)

Greg Stein wrote:

> Urk. I'll give my own opinion (dunno whether this is shared or not), but I
> would be rather vehemently against CVS interop / shared code within the
> subversion code base. I'm just not up for the pollution and maintenance
> headaches that would entail.

What pollution and maintenance headaches? You only need libsvn_ra_cvs.
See IDEAS.

> My answer to people that want to try that: SVN
> is so much better, that you'll spend less time upgrading your CVS repository
> and using SVN, than you would in trying to get the two to work together.

Such an attitude will only serve to delay widespread acceptance ov SVN.
For instance, if we migrate the SVN sources to a SVN repository after
1.0, then either APR will also have to switch, or we'll have to take it
out of the tree.

You can't convert the whole world, so let's not be too fanatical about
our new religion. :-)

-- 
Brane �ibej
    home:   <brane_at_xbc.nu>             http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
    work:   <branko.cibej_at_hermes.si>   http://www.hermes-softlab.com/
     ACM:   <brane_at_acm.org>            http://www.acm.org/