Bruce: from your log message, I can't tell whether this change is the
reversion I requested earlier, but it looks like it might be.
If it is, could you do the same to anything else that's called
"..._statuses"? We should indicate plurality consistently. Using
"status_list" in some places, and "statuses" in others, when we mean
the same thing, would be a bad result.
Uh, always feel free to complain in a log message, but please do also
have a portion of the message devoted to actually describing the
change. :-)
Thanks,
-Karl
bkorb@tigris.org writes:
> User: bkorb
> Date: 00/11/12 10:08:56
>
> Modified: subversion/client cl.h
> Log:
> It was too simple to do right :-(
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.8 +2 -2 subversion/subversion/client/cl.h
>
> Index: cl.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/subversion/subversion/client/cl.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> retrieving revision 1.8
> diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8
> --- cl.h 2000/11/12 18:06:15 1.7
> +++ cl.h 2000/11/12 18:08:55 1.8
> @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@
>
>
> /* Print PATH's status line using STATUS. */
> -void svn_cl__print_status_list (svn_string_t *path, svn_wc_status_t *status);
> +void svn_cl__print_status (svn_string_t *path, svn_wc_status_t *status);
>
> /* Print a hash that maps names to status-structs to stdout for human
> consumption. */
> -void svn_cl__print_status (apr_hash_t *statushash, apr_pool_t *pool);
> +void svn_cl__print_status_list (apr_hash_t *statushash, apr_pool_t *pool);
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:14 2006