[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

I spent a couple hours this morning...

From: Lee Burgess <lefty_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2000-11-06 15:29:14 CET

Bruce Korb writes:
>
>
> Hi Karl, et al.
>
> I dusted off the generated options stuff and got it working
> such that it passes the "make check".
>

[...]

>
> I am presenting this because as progress is made with the
> current setup, it becomes that much harder to plug that
> work into this.

Then perhaps that is a clue that AutoOpt is not the right tool for
this job?

Don't get me wrong. I am not knocking AutoOpt. I have looked at it
and it is very powerful and flexible.

However, I think I am making a worthy observation when I note the
statement you make above.

What I mean is, there are two points you make that we should all take
to heart:

1) as progress continues on the client spec it grows away from being
   easily compatible with AutoOpt

2) the idea that we are plugging the subversion client into AutoOpt

Remember, this is just an observation. Maybe I am just being petty
over semantics; but I think it might be more appropriate to think in
terms of using an option parser that we can plug into the subversion
client, rather than the other way around.

-- 
Lee P. W. Burgess  <<!>>  Manipulate eternity. Power is a symphony:
Programmer         <<!>>  elaborate, enormous, essential.
Red Bean Software  <<!>>  Dream the moment with a fiddle in summer 
lefty@red-bean.com <<!>>  and a knife in winter.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:14 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.