Re: bxxp and subversion

"Constantine Plotnikov" <cap@novosoft.ru> writes:
> I was confused by design docs. I infered from them that development has been
> not started and design decision on protocol are not finalized. If
> development is already started, then there is little sense to change on this
> stage. I will revisit this later when currently planned protocol and network
> layers implemtation of will take form.

You may have missed the note at the top of

   http://subversion.tigris.org/project_docs.html

It says

   NOTE: the design document is now quite out-of-date with respect to
   the code; we're going to revamp it once the code is stabilized, but
   until then it's just stale. For now you should read the design doc
   only for an overview of the project. Anything you see in the source
   code (especially header files) definitely supersedes the design
   doc.

So clearly, there is code. :-)

> Please update "Project Status" on http://subversion.tigris.org/index.html,

This section is accurate, and clearly indicates that there is running
code.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:14 2006