Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: 2000-10-29 13:39:30 CET
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Dave Glowacki wrote:
> So both Daniel and Steve think it's silly to use a standard command to
So, I think I'd better make myself clear since so many obviously read it that
No, I don't think 'cvs -n update' is a silly command. I didn't even know
> Is there something blatantly *wrong* about using 'cvs update' (or 'cvs -n
You're free to use the command however you please. I think that a command
I've learned about 'cvs -n update'. I might start using that! ;-)
-- Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77 ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`olReceived on Sat Oct 21 14:36:13 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.