Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?

On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:33:33AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Matt, it may help to know that the svn status command is not *nearly*
> as verbose as cvs's. In fact, we're trying to keep it to exactly one
> line per file, and so far this is working out.

Yeah, Jim pointed this out as well. That's perfect. I *really* need to
get caught up on my reading. :-)

I would say, if there's some reason `svn status' *can't* have one line per
file as its default output, then some other command should.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:13 2006