Re: Split the functions of `cvs update'?
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: 2000-10-27 10:50:12 CEST
On 27 Oct 2000, Matthew Braithwaite wrote:
> `cvs update' has a dual function: it reports the status of your
Hm, I've never really concidered the first case being a separate function.
> One frequently does a `cvs update' in order to answer the question,
I'd say that is a rather silly use of update. IMHO :-)
> Accordingly I think it might make sense to re-package the handy status
Well, if you take the mentioned 'cvs status' command, it already today tells
In what way would this suggested other command differ?
Personally, I usually have a little alias or script to do 'cvs status | grep
Or am I missing something?
-- Daniel Stenberg - http://daniel.haxx.se - +46-705-44 31 77 ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`olReceived on Sat Oct 21 14:36:12 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.