Re: `svn status' details

Bruce Korb <bkorb@sco.COM> writes:

> Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> >
> > Implemented `svn status' command. Here are some details,...
> >
> > [sussman@newton:~]$ ./svn status t1/A/D
> > 1 (r none) - t1/A/D
> >
> > Notice in the last example that we're getting the status of a
> > *directory*. Yummy.
>
> Recursion, then, defaults to OFF? (Unlike other recursive commands.)

Good point, I think a request for directory status should print the
status of all entries in the directory (including "."). That's what
CVS does.

Actually, there's a bigger issue here. Right now, there are a number
of commands that are *supposed* to take multiple file and directory
arguments, but don't. Tomorrow is the day we start tackling this.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:12 2006