Re: new svn command/feature
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2000-10-20 17:47:58 CEST
"B. W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com> writes:
That's what I assumed, too.
> * Note, that if you were to do an update at this point, bar.c would be
If bar.c is locally removed, then there's a conflict if it has changed
We should behave the way CVS does here. Below, I cvs rm'd a file foo
prompt$ cvs server: Updating .
-K
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.