[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: M2 planning (was: Re: some APR brokenness, I think)

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2000-10-19 16:14:56 CEST

Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> Right. If the above set of features doesn't sound right (e.g. you want to
> throw property handling in :-), then we can adjust. Otherwise, I'll handle
> updates and simple commits (no copying or renaming of files/dirs yet).

Sounds good.

> Seems reasonable so far. I'll flesh out the TASKS/STACK file and see how
> that feels.

Thank you.

> Quite fine by me. As I mentioned before, I actually think that
> libsvn_ra_local could end up as a crutch during development if we aren't
> careful. ("I don't want to run Apache... just let me do my dev over this
> little local loop here"; oops.. there goes testing for our main code path)

My fear too.

> Lessee... three weeks starting November 1. I'm all up for declaring M2 to
> occur right before T-Day (somewhere in the 20th to 22nd) and then having
> people take a break.

Sounds good to me!

I'll write this all up somewhere permanent.

-K
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:12 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.