Re: More diff performance notes

I wrote:
>> You no longer need an offset when you encode "copy from new data"
>> instructions.

Branko wrote:
> But you never need it, anyway. The offset in the new data is
> implicit -- you start at 0 and advance it by <size> in every add
> instruction.

Good point. So, moving the data around was irrelevant; the important
part was getting rid of the offsets. I'll keep storing the data in a
separate segment, then.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:10 2006