[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Milestone 1 status

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_galois.collab.net>
Date: 2000-10-08 22:49:52 CEST

Jim Blandy <jimb@savonarola.red-bean.com> writes:
> Karl's home net connection is down, and he's about to leave to catch a
> train, but he says "Thank you!" And promises to remember the lesson
> well.

I stopped in at the office on the way in, so am (of course) checking
email.

Again (in case I didn't say it before) please make whatever changes
you need to in libsvn_wc to get your new vcdiff-like format working,
Greg.

> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> > > Greg Hudson recently checked in some major changes to the
> > > xml-tag-writing library; however, given that this bug has happened
> > > before, and Greg's changes seem to be working fine most of the time,
> > > I highly doubt that he introduced a bug... Rather, stimulated an old
> > > one.
> >
> > I did, actually, fix a couple of pool handling problems when I checked
> > in those changes, and didn't find a good place to mention it (since I
> > also changed the function name). svn_xml_append_tag_hash was
> > allocating a subpool, passing it to svn_string_append* for a string
> > visible to the caller, and then destroying the pool, which is
> > distinctly naughty. Also, svn_xml_append_tag_v was leaking a bit of
> > memory from the calling pool to generate the temporary hash table; I
> > made it generate the hash into a subpool.
> >
> > So, while I don't think I introduced any bugs, I certainly made
> > changes which could affect the reproduceability of an existing bug. I
> > will have a go at fixing the bug you describe myself, assuming I can
> > reproduce it.
> >
> > [Read read read]
> >
> > > That gets a reliable seg fault, but this time it corrupts data
> > > inside a subversion data structure (an edit baton) and may be easier
> > > to trace.
> >
> > Hey, I recognize that bug. I had a very similar thing to happen to me
> > in the XML output editor. The problem is here:
> >
> > eb = apr_palloc (subpool, sizeof (*edit_baton));
> >
> > where edit_baton is a void **. Four bytes is not enough memory for an
> > editor baton. :) I will fix and see how much mileage that gets us.
> > In general, I found that if a structure is getting corrupted, the
> > first thing to check is whether you allocated enough memory for it,
> > given the APR pool system.
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:10 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.