[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: cvs commit confirmation (was: User interface proposal)

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2000-09-28 04:59:16 CEST

Karl Fogel wrote:
>
> Bob Miller <kbob@jogger-egg.com> writes:
> > As for "svn rm", I'd rather it be explicit, for the reasons others
> > have already cited. (I'd rather that "svn edit" be explicit, too.)
>
> The latter would cause a revolt, probably. :-) CVS working copies are
> editable the moment they appear on disk;
>
(Unless you define CVSREAD.)
>
> if people had to issue a
> command before editing files in Subversion, they'd be surprised and
> almost certainly unhappy.
>
I disagree. There are a lot of people out there (including me, sometimes
:-) who prefer to have unchanged working copies read-only, and
explicitly start a change with `cvs edit'.

(I'll post a longer message about this and other "wishlist" topics that
I've been working on, by the way, hopefully this week.).

    Brane
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:09 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.