[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: cvs commit confirmation (was: User interface proposal)

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2000-09-28 00:41:56 CEST

> As for "svn rm", I'd rather it be explicit, for the reasons others
> have already cited. (I'd rather that "svn edit" be explicit, too.)

An interesting side benefit of making "svn edit" explicit is that you
can make a "pristine copy" under SVN/ at that time, if you didn't have
one already.

But I think we want to stick with the CVS model of operation by
default, where all files are editable. (Although I think "cvs watch"
can be used to force an explicit "cvs edit" before editing.)
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:09 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.