On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 02:44:07PM -0700, Bob Miller wrote:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Sorry -- when I said they haven't been decided, I just mean that the
> > *names* of the properties hadn't been decided. The basic mechanics
> > have, though, as Ben describes below.
> Right. I'm nowhere near ready to use them, I'm just aware of the
> eventual need.
> At some point, do we want an Official List of property names and
> formats that subversion uses internally? I'm sure that cvs2svn isn't
> the only tool that would benefit...
Note that I have (in the past, and still continue to do so) lobbied for
property names to formally be defined as URIs. The current design doc is a
bit loose in this respect.
Presuming that we do *that*, then I would also suggest that we explicitly
use the DAV property names where they apply. If we don't, then I'll just end
up mapping SVN propnames to DAV names for the wire and back again. Seems a
bit silly :-)
There are standard propnames such as DAV:checkin-date and DAV:comment.
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:09 2006