[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CVS update: subversion/subversion/include svn_fs.h

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2000-09-09 23:06:55 CEST

On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 01:53:57PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 01:44:32PM -0700, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 09:39:15AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > Also, TIME probably needs to be more precise than seconds since epoch,
> > > because several transactions might arrive in one second. Adding the
> > > microsecond count from gettimeofday() should be good enough.
> >
> > Why not just use an incremented counter (plus pid)? This avoids a
> > system call per transaction, and is just simpler.
> I got the impression that each transaction was handled by a separate
> process. A counter wouldn't work unless it was stored on the
> filesystem or in shared memory - either of which involves more system
> calls to get at. And if gettimeofday(2) isn't dirt cheap, your OS has
> serious problems.

The counter doesn't have to be unique across all threads/processes. The
format would still be PID.COUNTER. Therefore, it can reside in the PID's
state and you're all set.


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:08 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.