[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: collected vs distributed working copy metadata

From: Branko Čibej <branko.cibej_at_hermes.si>
Date: 2000-08-10 11:54:56 CEST

Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Branko [iso-8859-2] Čibej wrote:
> > 5) Metadata in _one file_ in each directory
> >
> > pro: subdirs are easily detachable;
> > exactly as many globbing problems as, e.g., .cvsignore
> > con: would have to be some sort of filesystem-in-a-file,
> > not easily examined or modified by hand.
>
> Also, this will suffer in large directories or when very many users doing
> operations on the same dir since all operations will use (lock) the same
> single file.

Not if it's a proper database, with record locking. And that's
a prerequisite, anyway.

    Brane

-- 
Branko Čibej                 <branko.cibej@hermes.si>
HERMES SoftLab, Litijska 51, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
voice: (+386 1) 586 53 49     fax: (+386 1) 586 52 70
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:06 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.