Re: [subversion-dev] Re: SCCS vs RCS

On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 12:43:50PM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> > We ran tests...
> > I'll believe that the original SCCS was slower than RCS after a few
> > hundred deltas, but only because the implementation was lame.
>
> Hmm. That's actually tremendously useful to know, and thank you. Is there an
> implementation of SCCS these days that is not lame?

The version I worked on is (finally!) available in public beta from
bitkeeper.com.

zw
Received on Sat Oct 21 14:36:05 2006