[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository

From: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:30:46 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:stsp_at_elego.de]
> Sent: maandag 1 februari 2016 11:11
> To: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
> Cc: Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan2_at_apache.org>; Gert Kello
> <gert.kello_at_gmail.com>; users_at_subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository
>
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:06:19AM +0000, Philip Martin wrote:
> > Stefan Fuhrmann <stefan2_at_apache.org> writes:
> >
> > > So, all user content is there and merely the deduplication failed
> > > (as already being investigated elsewhere in this thread).
> >
> > I suppose format 7 might allow us to implement a system that fixes
> > missing deduplication during packing.
>
> And perhaps get rid of sqlite in the repository while at it?

I think at least that last part will require a format 8. Optimizing pack
should (theoretically) be possible without a format bump. We could even
backport changes that allow this, but I'm still waiting on real world test
experience with format 7.

There are still far too many users delaying their upgrades to 1.9 waiting
for others to switch :(

Waiting for the ASF to perform a major upgrade is on reason I hear quite
often...

        Bert
Received on 2016-02-01 12:31:02 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.