>I'm assuming that this bulky repository has a long history, with
>thousands of transactions, and you're doing a raw file-system based
>rsync?
What is raw file-system based rsync ? Can you shed some light on it?
>Make sure you have rsync version 3.x, to start with, and *do not* try
>to run it over some poorly tuned intermediate network file system such
>as NFSv3. And frankly, Sun hardware is rapidly being phased out. I
>haven't seen anyone using it for production in more than 2 years, only
>in legacy apps that they have no interest or willingness to change
>anything for.
We are using 3.x version of rsync. Yes your are right we had bad experience
on Solaris OS of running svn while on Linux OS performance was good.
Cheers,
Mohsin
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Mohsin <mohsinchandia_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>Assume you realize that rsync is not part of Subversion?
> >
> > Yes rsync is separate utility which is used for syncing purpose . Rsync
> > nothing to do with subversion.
>
> I'm assuming that this bulky repository has a long history, with
> thousands of transactions, and you're doing a raw file-system based
> rsync?
>
> Make sure you have rsync version 3.x, to start with, and *do not* try
> to run it over some poorly tuned intermediate network file system such
> as NFSv3. And frankly, Sun hardware is rapidly being phased out. I
> haven't seen anyone using it for production in more than 2 years, only
> in legacy apps that they have no interest or willingness to change
> anything for.
>
Received on 2014-12-12 19:04:45 CET