[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion Windows Performance compared to Linux

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:49:07 -0700

On 4/28/14, 8:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> There's no concurrent access happening - just home directories where a
> user will be working on one machine or another - which is mostly
> transparent to normal applications.. Should there be a difference if
> they work on the server hosting the exported partition or will it
> still be slow due to locking?

It will not be slow in that scenario. I have my working copies on NFS to make
it easy to use a local editor but run some commands on the server where they
are mounted from.

Branko, is just warning you not to run concurrent operations from both the NFS
host and NFS clients as that is more likely to allow the assumptions about file
system atomicity to be violated that Subversion depends on.

In theory what you're saying is safe, but in practice I think it's a lot
harder. It'd be very easy for a user to forget and run commands in two places.
Received on 2014-04-28 17:49:41 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.