On 06/26/2012 05:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:13:50PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:07 PM,<kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
>>> Any reason svnsync couldn't grow a "--fail-on-access-error" option?
>> Sure, I think that could be useful (as long as it's not the default
>> (backwards compat)).
> Would printing a warning not be sufficient?
That would be an improvement, but since it seems like sometimes this
behavior may be desired or expected, it may be better to always print a
warning, and bomb out given an extra option like that suggested by
Kevin, above.
Received on 2012-06-27 17:56:12 CEST