Re: "database disk image is malformed"
On 1/27/2012 3:41, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Evan Driscoll wrote on Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 15:04:43 -0600:
>> 1. Did removing rep-cache.db fix it, or is there still a potential for
>> some latent repository corruption?
> Yes. rep-cache.db is used by the commit process. If that file was
> silently corrupted, it's possible that the text: and props:
> lines on node-revisions point to invalid data. (In English: versioned
> properties, file contents, and symlinks targets may be affected.)
> I think the list archives and the developer docs explain this, so I'm
> not going into detail here. But feel free to follow up (on list) if you
> have questions that those don't cover.
I ran 'svnadmin verify' (as Mark Cooke suggested) and it did not
indicate any problems. Does that mean there aren't any (or that the
probability is vanishingly small)?
Received on 2012-01-27 17:32:51 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users