[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "Couldn't open rep-cache database" (post commit FS processing)

From: Aleksandr Sidorenko <asidorenko_at_cashontime.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:37:10 +0000

On 2011-11-16, at 11:15 , Philip Martin wrote:

> Aleksandr Sidorenko <asidorenko_at_cashontime.com> writes:
>
>> The sqlite command worked (I see the expected output), but I suspect that's because the rep-cache.db file was already there (since 1.6.12). If I move it, though, the file is NOT recreated.
>>
>> greping through /proc/xxx/maps gives me the following:
>>
>> 2a96fc4000-2a97058000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 18104376 /usr/local/lib/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6
>> 2a97058000-2a97158000 ---p 00094000 08:01 18104376 /usr/local/lib/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6
>> 2a97158000-2a9715c000 rw-p 00094000 08:01 18104376 /usr/local/lib/libsqlite3.so.0.8.6
>>
>> sqlite was built with default options, but "--enable-threadsafe" defaults to "yes" if it's not used, so I guess it *is* built with thread support?
>
> Try this patch:
>
> Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
> ===================================================================
> --- subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (revision 1202738)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (working copy)
> @@ -5580,6 +5580,7 @@
> svn_error_t *err;
> err = svn_fs_fs__get_rep_reference(&old_rep, b->fs, rep->sha1_checksum,
> b->parent_pool);
> + SVN_ERR(err);
> /* ### Other error codes that we shouldn't mask out? */
> if (err == SVN_NO_ERROR
> || err->apr_err == SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT
>
> To make the first error hard. Then try committing a file over ra_local:
>
> $ rm -rf repo && svnadmin create repo
> $ svn import -mm repo/format file://`pwd`/repo/f
>
> That should make the error explicit.

Ok, I tried this patch, and this is the error I get:

svn: E200030: SQLite compiled for 3.7.9, but running with 3.3.17

So, it seems the sqlite version I compiled is NOT getting used; it's taking the older one. I suspect it's not looking in the right place (/usr/lib64 vs /usr/local/lib). I'm going to investgate this.
Received on 2011-11-16 17:37:44 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.