Thanks Daniel. Responses inline.
>> David Hopkins wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:30:46 +0800: I'm not
>> why the verification command for revision 192 would throw an error
>> description for revision 162. Revision 192 affected a completely
>> different part of the repository to revision 162, so there is no
>> relationship between them.
> Possibly due to rep-sharing? Does db/revs/0/192 contain the number
> in ASCII decimal delimited by whitespace? You can check that with the
> following command: grep -a "^text:" db/revs/0/192
Yes it does.
Here's the context in the rev file:
text: 162 670867 6111 52486 5117fb0964ca1a78dd97447d23452e73
copyroot: 32 [redacted]
Looking at the other nearby entries, they have "text: 192 [...]"
instead of "text: 162 [...]". Is that likely to be the problem?
> Does 'svnadmin dump -r 162 >NUL' work ?
Yes it does.
> To answer your question: yes, most definitely a copy of the r192
> r162) rev file would allow to pinpoint the problem, however you might
> not want to share those files on a public list as they may contain
> sensitive data (versioned file contents).
I'll find out if I can release the broken revisions in their entirety.
The corrupted revision doesn't actually contain anything particularly
important (almost all the modified files in it have since been replaced
by newer versions anyway). Can I fix the repository by dumping every
revision except 192, and then reloading the good revisions into a new
repo? Or will cause problems for the revisions after 192 since one of
the revisions no longer exists?
===== PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE =====
The information contained in this message is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute, take any action in reliance on it, or disclose any details of the message to any person, firm or corporation. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments.
The views or opinions expressed in this e-mail or any attachment are not necessarily those of Serck Controls Pty Ltd.
NOTE - You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment.
Received on 2011-09-16 02:30:56 CEST