[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn log behaviour

From: Alex Bligh <alex_at_alex.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:57:50 +0000

--On 14 February 2011 01:10:08 -0600 Ryan Schmidt
<subversion-2011a_at_ryandesign.com> wrote:

>> If I do "svn log ." in a directory, it does not list all changes made to
>> all files in that directory (as shown up "svn log <filename>"). I've
>> pasted an example at:
>> http://pastebin.com/SFYDtkBk
>> where r12062 does not show up in "svn log .", but does on the changed
>> file.
>>
>> svn diff . does the expected, and the file is not in svn:ignore.
>>
>> Is this deliberate and how do I get a recursive list of logs?
>
> Is the directory up to date? Try "svn up" first. Otherwise you'll only
> get logs up to the revision of the directory (shown with "svn info").

Yes, the directory is up to date. In fact all changes were made in that
directory (not on another machine).

-- 
Alex Bligh
Received on 2011-02-14 08:58:29 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.