[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion/Tortoise questions

From: Phil Pinkerton <pcpinkerton_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:08:20 -0500

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Ludwig, Michael
<Michael.Ludwig_at_delphi-mb.de> wrote:
>> >> 4) Is the another GUI Subversion client that has better performance
>> >> when content is being checked out to a Windows network drive.
>> >
>> > You won't find much variation, because they almost all use the same
>> > core libraries or code.
>>
>> What about SvnAnt ?
>
> SvnAnt uses the svnClientAdapter.jar, which in turn uses one of:
>
> (1) JavaHL - Java/JNI to C++ core library interface [1]
> (2) SvnKit - pure Java implementation [2]
> (3) command line client, for example [3]
>
> Performance should be best for JavaHL.
>
> But a network drive is a network drive.
>
> And the current working copy format generates many files.
>
> Michael
>
> [1] http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html
> [2] http://svnkit.com/
> [3] http://www.sliksvn.com/
>

With regards to the Windows Subversion Client. If several scripts are
using the Subversion Command line client is the client shared or is a
separate client launched when separate scripts are ran at the same
time ?
Received on 2010-11-10 18:08:57 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.