Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 08:41:51 -0400:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Alan Barrett <apb_at_cequrux.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> > What he really wants is an alternate-universe Subversion which never
> >> > had the plaintext password storage feature in the first place.
> >>
> >> I'd settle for being able to block that local use on the server side:
> >
> > OK, so you want a feature in which the client reports to the server
> > "here are some important aspects of my configuration", and the server
> > replies "I don't like <this> aspect of your configuration, so I refuse
> > to work with you". I suggest that you write up a proposal for such a
> > feature, or begin a focused discussion about how such a feature could
> > work and could be useful.
>
> I think the gpg-agent support will provide that by forcing people to a
> new authentication protocol. Won't that work?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/121768
Received on 2010-10-17 16:40:54 CEST