[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: libsvn_ra_neon-1.so.0: undefined symbol: GENERAL_NAME_free

From: Angel Tsankov <fn42551_at_fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:18:48 +0300

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Angel Tsankov <fn42551_at_fmi.uni-sofia.bg> wrote:
>> When I run kdesvn I get a dialog showing the following message:
>>
>> Could not find our part: Cannot load library /usr/lib/kde4/kdesvnpart.so:
>> (/usr/lib/libsvn_ra_neon-1.so.0: undefined symbol: GENERAL_NAME_free)
>>
>> Files /usr/lib/kde4/kdesvnpart.so and /usr/lib/libsvn_ra_neon-1.so.0 both
>> exist. The former is part of kdesvn and the latter is part of subversion.
>> In case this is relevant, I have installed the following packages:
>>
>> * openssl 0.9.8j (configured with --prefix=/usr --openssldir=/usr/share);
>> * neon 0.28.4 (configured with --prefix=/usr --with-ssl);
>> * subversion 1.6.12 (configured with --prefix=/usr).
>>
>> Do I need to upgrade openssl or neon? Or is the problem elsewhere?
>
> Start from the beginning. Are you building all of these components
> yourself,

I build myself all of these packages from source and install them.

> and then slapping kdesvn on top?

I don't know what you mean by 'slapping kdesvn on top'. I simply build
(from source) and install kdesvn after installing all these packages the
way I already explained.

> Or are you installing pre-built binaries from an upstream source?

No, I'm not installing pre-built binaries.

Angel Tsankov
Received on 2010-07-21 14:20:05 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.