RE: Tigris binary packages for Windows
I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11 announced a few days ago.
~ Mark C
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Troy Simpson <troy_at_ebswift.com> wrote:
>> A minimum level of support would be a good thing to agree
>> on. Bear in mind the pre-stated
>> complexities in handling too many supported installations.
>> Maybe start at the baseline of 2.2x
>> apache support and see if a volunteer is able to deliver
>> builds for that?
> When you talk about Apache 2.2 support I assume you mean you need
> mod_dav_svn and not just to have SVN compiled against Apache 2.2's
> version of APR?
> One other "pain" I thought of is that ideally the binaries should be
> built using MSVC 6.0 (I am assuming DJ has not changed that). Since
> the httpd binaries are built using that you can have problems if a
> newer Visual Studio is used for mod_dav_svn. You also have to deal
> with distributing the MS runtime libraries if a newer version is used.
> The "pain" is that is not possible to obtain a legal copy of MSVC 6.0
> anymore. So unless you already have a copy you cannot get it.
> Building with Visual Studio 2008 is a lot simpler but has these other
> problems to contend with.
Received on 2010-04-22 17:06:37 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users