Re: svn 1.5 merge -c revision and svn diff/log confusion

Tyler Roscoe pisze:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 04:17:25PM +0100, Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
>> modification on the branch) and I do svn log -v -r 52851 -g I saw that
>> my commit contains "more" that original commit r52829. After svn diff
>> I saw that commit r52851 contains mergeinfo "mess" for a random files
>> and random directories of sql/. So could anybody help me in interpreting
>> such sitiuation?
>
> This question is asked about once a week. Search the archives for plenty
> of answers and options about how to proceed.

1) maybe... but I try to look archives from 06.2008, 07.2008 for finding
answers and those mails were not satisfactory for me. Next I'm not
reading day by day users@ mailing list. But maybe I should slowly dig
into next month of users@...

For example thread http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2008-07/0932.shtml
was interesting but at the end was asking next question from the
author... and problem seems open.

2) If this question is such often asked maybe developers of subversion
should nominate this problem and answer officially in their subversion
FAQ? I read a FAQ and release notes and nothing find about.

3) If something is repeadedly asked so maybe is to difficult and too odd
to understand for a usual subversion user of <1.5.

Regards,
Karol Szkudlarek

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2412232

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].