On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Trent
Nelson<svn-users-list_at_trentnelson.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:14:00PM +0000, Trent Nelson wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:20:32PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Bob Archer <Bob.Archer_at_amsi.com> wrote:
>> > >> I wrote the text that was quoted, and it is not as absolute as has
>> > >> been made out. You can still use the branch. The blog you were
>> > >
>> > > But you can't reintegrate it, right? Which kind of makes it unuseable.
>> >
>> > Sure you can. This works:
>> >
>> > $ svn co ^/branch1
>> > $ svn ci -m "work on branch"
>> > $ svn merge ^/trunk
>> > $ svn ci -m "Catch up with trunk"
>> >
>> > On trunk WC
>> > $ svn merge --reintegrate ^/branch1
>> > $ svn ci -m "Commit all work from branch1"
>> > Committed revision 100
>> >
>> > Back on branch1
>> > $ svn merge --record-only -r100 ^/trunk
>> > $ svn ci -m "Mark r100 as merged"
>
> -r100 is semantically equivalent to -r0:100, right?
No, it is a typo that I think would fail. It should be -c 100.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=2360284
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-06-08 15:24:54 CEST