Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:
>
>>> Well originally I was thinking that it would be a very reasonable
>>> tradeoff to disable revprop editing on packed revisions. I think the
>>> majority of times this is used is to fix a log message, and that
>>> usually happens soon after the commit. It then occurred to me there
>>> are tools like svnsync and svk that use revprops. I think they
>>> usually use revision 0, so that would be a pretty minor special case.
>> We've gone back in our own svn repos and modified very old commit messages,
>> so I wouldn't be too happy if I couldn't modify it.
>
> Nothing would be forcing you to pack the repository and if the
> tradeoff is known, where is the loss?
The loss is if you do want both features.
I don't like backing up 190,000 revprop files on our repository, but I would
like to change them also.
Blair
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1900654
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-25 02:59:43 CEST