[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: @REV vs -r REV

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:27:03 -0500

David Weintraub wrote:
>
>
> foo/
> bar/barfoo.txt
>
> Now create a new file called foobar.txt under the foo directory.
> Commit your changes. Your repository will now look like this:
>
> foo/foobar.txt
> bar/barfoo.txt
>
> To our mortal eyes, we assume that foo/foobar.txt in Rev 1 of the
> repository is an ancestor of foo/foobar.txt in Rev 3 of the
> repository. However, this is not true, and Subversion knows this.

Even worse. From a mortal's point of view, the contents of the newly
created foo/foobar.txt may in fact have come directly from
bar/barfoo.txt with associated ancestry through perfectly normal mortal
means of duplicating contents (cut/paste, etc.). However, if you don't
go through the proper steps of subversions's required procedure,
subversion doesn't know this.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1862619
To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org].
Received on 2009-04-22 18:28:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.